Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a general score of 84.9, which is better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro's general score of 71.8. The Galaxy A80 is a somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner device than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. The Galaxy A80 features just a little better processing power than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both of them have 8 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a screen that is just as good as the Blackview BL6000 Pro one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A80 has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite larger screen. Samsung Galaxy A80 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro. Both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and a 48 megapixels back camera.
Blackview BL6000 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Blackview BL6000 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.