Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.56 x 3.20 x 0.50 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.63 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Grey and Silver | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2300 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 397 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800 MT6873 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 4x ARM Cortex-A76 cores at 2.0 GHz and 4x ARM Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-Natt MC4 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5280mAh Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a lot better than the Blackview BL6000 Pro, with a general score of 87.1 against 71.8. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 is a much thinner and a lot lighter cellphone than the Blackview BL6000 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little sharper display than Blackview BL6000 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note9 also has a greater screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better processor than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Blackview BL6000 Pro, although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot less MP resolution back camera. Blackview BL6000 Pro features superior battery performance than Galaxy Note9, because it has a 5280mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.