Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is better than Blackview BL8800 Pro, having a score of 84.5 against 71.9. The iPhone XS Max construction is much lighter and extremely thinner than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. IPhone XS Max counts with a superior processor than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XS Max features a bit better looking display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution, a bit greater display density and a brighter screen. Blackview BL8800 Pro features a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XS Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity.
IPhone XS Max features a bit better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a back camera with a lot lower resolution, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.