Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is just a bit better than the Blackview BL8800 Pro, with a 77.7 score against 71.9. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS, but HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11. The HTC One M9 is an notably older phone than Blackview BL8800 Pro, but HTC managed to build it notably lighter and a lot thinner anyway.
HTC One M9 counts with just a little better processing power than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an additional graphics processor and a 64 bits processing unit. The HTC One M9 features a slightly better looking screen than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos and a camera in the back with a way worse 20 MP resolution. Blackview BL8800 Pro features a much greater memory to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 195% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.