Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note9 has an overall score of 87.1, which is way better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's global score of 71.9. Galaxy Note9's body is extremely lighter and noticeably thinner than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy Note9 has a bit better processing unit than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note9 features a little more vivid display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better camera than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a much worse resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography.
Galaxy Note9 has a superior memory for games and applications than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Blackview BL8800 Pro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has an 8380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.