Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a general score of 87.1, which is way better than Blackview BL8800's 71.9 score. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 construction is way thinner and a lot lighter than Blackview BL8800, although it was released many years before. Galaxy Note9 has a bit superior processing unit than Blackview BL8800, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy Note9 features a little more vivid display than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a better count of pixels per screen inch. Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a little bit better camera than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a camera with lot less megapixels, it also counts with a larger aperture.
Galaxy Note9 counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than Blackview BL8800, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note9 also has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Blackview BL8800 features a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has an 8380mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.