Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 59.8 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.51 x 3.21 x 0.63 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.16 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 160.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5180mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.88 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is a lot better than Blackview BV7200, with a overall score of 83.3 against 59.8. The Galaxy S9 construction is thinner and notably lighter than the Blackview BV7200. The Galaxy S9 has a way better screen than Blackview BV7200, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a much greater display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way better performance than Blackview BV7200, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Blackview BV7200 counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has more internal storage and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Blackview BV7200, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less MP, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos. The Blackview BV7200 counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5180mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy S9 is also cheaper than the Blackview BV7200, making this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.