Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-20 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 405 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than Blackview BV8100, with a 91.8 score against 74.5. Galaxy A71 5G's construction is extremely lighter and much thinner than Blackview BV8100, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the older 11 version and Blackview BV8100 has Android 14 version.
The Blackview BV8100 features a lot better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Blackview BV8100 also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each display inch. Blackview BV8100 has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a little faster processor than Blackview BV8100, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G captures greater photos and videos than Blackview BV8100, because it has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels. The Blackview BV8100 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 8800mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.