Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.5 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-20 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.92 x 3.20 x 0.71 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 12.70 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Aurora Orange, Emerald Green and Starry Black | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 405 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| 4400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.47 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a score of 87.1, which is better than Blackview BV8100's 74.5 general score. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy Note9 is older than Blackview BV8100, it's body is thinner and lighter. Blackview BV8100 features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Note9, because although it has a little bit lower display pixels density and a lot lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
Blackview BV8100 features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has 128 GB more internal memory and an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy Note9 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Blackview BV8100, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Blackview BV8100 has a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note9, because it has an 8800mAh battery size against 4000mAh. The Galaxy Note9 has a greater camera than Blackview BV8100, although it has a way lower 12 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.