Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 406 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is way better than the Blackview BV8900, having a 91.8 score against 73.1. The Galaxy A71 5G is an older cellphone than Blackview BV8900, but Samsung was able to build it extremely lighter and notably thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while Blackview BV8900 has Android 13 version.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a bit faster CPU than Blackview BV8900, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Blackview BV8900 counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2408 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior camera than Blackview BV8900. They have the same resolution back camera. Blackview BV8900 counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 128 GB more internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Blackview BV8900 has a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has 10380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.