Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 5.1 |
| 2023-06-12 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 406 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 10.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S6 edge+ is just a bit better than the Blackview BV8900, with a general score of 79.3 against 73.1. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version while Blackview BV8900 has Android 13. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S6 edge+ is incredibly older than the Blackview BV8900, it's design is thinner and way lighter.
Blackview BV8900 features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a brighter display than Blackview BV8900, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a superior camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back facing camera. Blackview BV8900 features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Blackview BV8900 has a superior battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 10380mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.