Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| 2023-06-12 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 14.04 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 406 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P90 MT6779V (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GM9446 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 10380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 10.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Blackview BV8900, getting an 85.5 score against 73.1. Despite of the fact that Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is way older than the Blackview BV8900, it's body is noticeably thinner and notably lighter. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better hardware performance than Blackview BV8900. Both have a 8 GB RAM memory and 8 cores.
The Blackview BV8900 and the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 feature really similar displays, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a bit lower display pixels density, a bit smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2246, it also counts with a quite brighter screen. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior camera than Blackview BV8900, although it has a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back.
The Blackview BV8900 has more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Blackview BV8900 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Blackview BV8900 features a very superior battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 160% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.