Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.25 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ZenFone AR is a little bit better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a overall score of 77.4 against 71.5. Asus ZenFone AR's design is somewhat lighter but a little thicker than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much better display than Asus ZenFone AR, because although it has a quite lower pixel density and a bit worse 1080 x 2460 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features just a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone AR captures better videos and photos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution.
Asus ZenFone AR has a quite bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Asus ZenFone AR also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much longer battery performance than Asus ZenFone AR, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.