Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 13 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.99 ounces | -- |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A34 is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having an 82.9 score against 71.5. Both phones in this comparison review work with the same Android 13 OS (Operating System), so both should provide the user all the same OS features. The Samsung Galaxy A34 construction is extremely thinner and notably lighter than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little bit worse count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A34, because it has more internal memory and an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A34 features a little bit better performance than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy A34's battery life is just as good as the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 one. The Galaxy A34 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way worse resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.