Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is way better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a 90.7 score against 71.5. The Galaxy A52 design has the same thickness than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, but it's a little lighter. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a way better looking screen than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460.
The Galaxy A52 and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 both count with incredibly similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A52 has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy A52 takes much better photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both of them have a same resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A52 has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 1 TB. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.