Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting a general score of 84.2 against 71.5. The Galaxy A7 (2018) body is lighter and a bit thinner than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 and the Galaxy A7 (2018) have incredibly similar processing units, and although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a lot better looking screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a just a little lower screen density, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) shoots better photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a much worse 24 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with slightly more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.