Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31s has an overall score of 88, which is way better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy M31s's construction is thicker and just a little heavier than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. These devices come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy M31s has the previous 11 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features a bit better processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy M31s, because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with longer battery duration than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy M31s has a much better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have a back-facing camera with a 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.