| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4 |
| -- | 2013-03-14 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 17 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Galaxy S4 is much better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, with a 79 score against 71.5. The Galaxy S4 is a just a little thinner and much lighter cellphone than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but Galaxy S4 has older 4.4 version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a better screen than Galaxy S4, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a way larger screen. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S4, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S4, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2600mAh.
Galaxy S4 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.