Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| -- | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 395 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.69 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, getting an 80.1 score against 71.5. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a much heavier and thicker device than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13 version.
The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot worse pixel amount per display inch and a bit lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger display. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features much more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better processing power than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.