Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 13 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ3 has a score of 79.6, which is much better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's 71.5 overall score. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xperia XZ3 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13, so it gives a lot of extra features and better performance. Xperia XZ3's design is just a little bit lighter but thicker than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a brighter display than Xperia XZ3, because although it has a lot lower amount of pixels in each inch in the display and a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a quite larger screen. Sony Xperia XZ3 counts with a bit better processor than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The Sony Xperia XZ3 has a lot better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way lower resolution camera. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much better storage to install games and applications than Xperia XZ3, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has a very superior battery lifetime than Xperia XZ3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3330mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.