Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 13 | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black and White |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, having a global score of 77.8 against 71.5. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 has Android 13. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro design is just a bit heavier but extremely thinner than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a slightly better screen than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 2460 pixels resolution, a little bit smaller display and a just a bit lower pixels density, it also counts with a little bit brighter screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 counts with a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a way less megapixels back camera. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.