Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 13 | -- |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.63 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.99 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cerulean Blue, Cloudwing Grey and Flowing Purple | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 395 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 5000 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio G99 MT6789 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is better than the Blackview Oscal Tiger 12's global score of 71.5. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a a little lighter but a bit thicker device than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features a much more vibrant display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a lot brighter display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 256 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit better CPU than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12. Both have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a better camera than Blackview Oscal Tiger 12, although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels. The Blackview Oscal Tiger 12 features greater battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.