Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.9 | 51.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Coolpad |
| Android 4.2 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| -- | 2018-10-16 |
| 4.93 x 2.58 x 0.48 inches | 5.80 x 2.91 x 0.40 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 105.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 854 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 196 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Mali-400 (Dual-Core 500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 304 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 4.62 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.6 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE (4G) |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 1.5 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2150mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 340 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 4.08 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Coolpad illumina is a bit better than the BLU Advance 4.0, getting a 51.1 score against 46.9. Coolpad illumina's construction is thinner but heavier than BLU Advance 4.0. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Coolpad illumina has newer 8.1 Oreo version and BLU Advance 4.0 has Android 4.2.
The BLU Advance 4.0 features just a little better processing power than Coolpad illumina, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The BLU Advance 4.0 counts with a lot better looking screen than Coolpad illumina, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 800 x 480 and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density.
Coolpad illumina features slightly more memory to store more apps and games than BLU Advance 4.0, because although it has an external memory slot that admits up to 32 GB against 64 GB, it also counts with 4 GB more internal memory. The BLU Advance 4.0 counts with just a bit better camera than Coolpad illumina. Both of them have a 5 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, the same 1280x720 video definition and the same video frame rate.
The Coolpad illumina counts with superior battery duration than BLU Advance 4.0, because it has a 34 percent bigger battery size.
Coolpad illumina is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.