Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 67.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-09 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.92 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Raven black | Aurora black |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P70 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is a lot better than BLU Bold N1's general score of 67.4. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and BLU Bold N1 has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG V50 ThinQ's design is a little bit heavier but just a little thinner than BLU Bold N1, and they were released only 4 months apart.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a little faster processor than BLU Bold N1, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than BLU Bold N1, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater count of pixels per inch in the display and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than BLU Bold N1, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than BLU Bold N1, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots a bit better photos and videos than BLU Bold N1, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality, a bigger aperture for better low light photos and video and a much higher video resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.