Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-12-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6753 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than BLU Life One X3, having an 83.7 score against 60.1. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while BLU Life One X3 has Android 7.0 Nougat version. LG V50 ThinQ's body is newer and just a bit thinner than BLU Life One X3's, although it is also a little heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a more powerful CPU than BLU Life One X3, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better display than BLU Life One X3, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior camera than BLU Life One X3, because although it has a camera in the back with a lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture, a larger sensor and a much better (4K) video definition. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for apps and games than BLU Life One X3, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
BLU Life One X3 has superior battery life than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheaper than the BLU Life One X3.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.