Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.14 x 3.07 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2820mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 710 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than BLU Life One XL, with an 83.3 score against 54.1. The Samsung Galaxy S9 construction has the same thickness than BLU Life One XL, but it's just a little heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a little bit better processing power than BLU Life One XL, because although it has a 32-bits processing unit against 64-bits and doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S9 has a bit better looking screen than BLU Life One XL, because it has a little bit bigger display, a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution and a much higher display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Life One XL, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 400 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S9 counts with a little longer battery duration than BLU Life One XL, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a lot better camera than BLU Life One XL, because although it has a lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.