Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 4.2 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.67 x 2.87 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 850 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a lot better than BLU Life One, with a 78.8 score against 53.9. The Google Pixel 3a body is a bit thinner but a bit heavier than the BLU Life One. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version and BLU Life One has Android 4.2, so it gives a couple nice extra features and a performance increase.
The Google Pixel 3a features a little faster CPU than BLU Life One, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and 4 more cores. The Google Pixel 3a counts with a slightly better display than BLU Life One, because it has a better amount of pixels per inch of screen, a little larger display and a much better 1080 x 2220 resolution.
The Google Pixel 3a has a greater camera than BLU Life One, because although it has a back camera with a lower 12.2 MP resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. The Google Pixel 3a has a superior storage for games and applications than BLU Life One, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a much better battery performance than BLU Life One, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 3a costs a bit more money than BLU Life One, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.