Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.41 x 2.66 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 3.84 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Blue and White | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a lot better than the BLU Life Play S, with an 81.9 score against 52.3. Although it's the best we are comparing, Galaxy S8 Active is a way heavier and much thicker cellphone than BLU Life Play S. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more powerful processing unit than BLU Life Play S, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit sharper display than BLU Life Play S, because it has a bigger display, a much greater display pixel density and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960. Galaxy S8 Active has a much greater storage to install applications and games than BLU Life Play S, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy S8 Active captures greater photographs and videos than BLU Life Play S, because it has a way better video quality and a back camera with much more mega pixels. The Galaxy S8 Active has a much better battery life than BLU Life Play S, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is also the cheapest, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.