Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.39 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a global score of 80, which is much better than the BLU Life Play X's 53.6 general score. The Google Pixel 3 is a somewhat heavier phone than BLU Life Play X, but both of them are equally thin. Google Pixel 3 features a display that is very similar to BLU Life Play X's screen, although the Google Pixel 3 also has a greater pixel density, a bigger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2160px resolution.
The Google Pixel 3 features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than BLU Life Play X, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage. Google Pixel 3 has a little better hardware performance than BLU Life Play X, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 3 has a way better battery lifetime than BLU Life Play X, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 3 features a much better camera than BLU Life Play X, because it has a way higher (4K) video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 3 is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.