Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.6 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-04-21 |
| 5.39 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black | Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 173.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 is way better than BLU Life Play X, having a general score of 81.7 against 53.6. Galaxy S8's body has the same thickness than the BLU Life Play X, but it's somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a little bit better performance than BLU Life Play X, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and 4 more CPU cores.
Galaxy S8 features a slightly better display than BLU Life Play X, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. The Galaxy S8 shoots much better videos and photos than BLU Life Play X, because it has a camera with a much better 12 MP resolution and a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy S8 has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than BLU Life Play X, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 256 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with a way better battery duration than BLU Life Play X, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S8 is a little more expensive than BLU Life Play X, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.