Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.6 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.39 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 780 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a lot better than the BLU Life Play X, getting a general score of 83.3 against 53.6. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a a bit thicker and incredibly heavier cellphone than BLU Life Play X. The Galaxy S9 counts with a greater performance than BLU Life Play X, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a little more vivid display than BLU Life Play X, because it has way more pixels per inch of display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a bigger display. The Galaxy S9 features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than BLU Life Play X, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 400 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S9 has a superior battery life than BLU Life Play X, because it has a 67% larger battery size. The Galaxy S9 counts with a way better camera than BLU Life Play X, because it has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a lot more MP camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S9 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.