Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | HTC |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0 |
| -- | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.39 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 4.41 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 185.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 312 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 1.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 780 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is much better than the BLU Life Play's 48.9 general score. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but the HTC One M9 has the newer 5.0 version and BLU Life Play has Android 4.2, so it gives some additional features. HTC One M9 is a somewhat thicker and heavier phone than BLU Life Play.
HTC One M9 has a much powerful processor than BLU Life Play, because it has a better GPU, a 64-bits processor, a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The HTC One M9 has a sharper display than BLU Life Play, because it has a bit bigger screen, a higher display density and a lot better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The HTC One M9 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than BLU Life Play, because it has 32 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. HTC One M9 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than BLU Life Play, because it has a 2840mAh battery size.
HTC One M9 features a way better camera than BLU Life Play, because it has a lot higher 20 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
HTC One M9 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper than the BLU Life Play.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.