Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.79 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 900 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is much better than the BLU Life Pro, having an 83.3 score against 54.4. Despite being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S9 is a a little heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone than BLU Life Pro. Galaxy S9 has a more powerful processing unit than BLU Life Pro, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
Galaxy S9 has a bit better screen than BLU Life Pro, because it has a larger display, a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a lot higher quantity of pixels per inch in the screen. The Galaxy S9 takes much clearer videos and photos than BLU Life Pro, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels resolution, the Galaxy S9 also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy S9 counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than BLU Life Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 400 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has superior battery duration than BLU Life Pro, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2500mAh.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more than BLU Life Pro, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.