Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.8 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| -- | 2014-09-03 |
| 6.34 x 3.25 x 0.35 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 338.00 | $ 335.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 258 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (384 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.4 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 980 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | 18 hours talk time |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge is a lot better than the BLU Life View, with a general score of 81.7 against 52.8. Both phones in this review have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note Edge has 5.0 version while BLU Life View has Android 4.2 version. The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge construction is a bit thinner and way lighter than BLU Life View.
Galaxy Note Edge has an incredibly better looking screen than BLU Life View, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way greater screen pixels density and a lot higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Galaxy Note Edge counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Life View, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 128 GB and 32 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note Edge has a quite superior processing power than BLU Life View, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note Edge also has 2 GB more RAM and a faster 500 MHz graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note Edge takes a lot better videos and photos than BLU Life View, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way higher video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note Edge counts with just a bit better battery duration than BLU Life View, because it has a 3000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge is also cheaper than the other phone, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.