Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.5 | 47.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | HTC |
| Android 4.2 | Android 2.3.4 |
| -- | 2011-09-30 |
| 4.61 x 2.44 x 0.43 inches | 3.93 x 2.28 x 0.56 inches |
| 3.56 ounces | 3.70 ounces |
| White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 3.2 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 165 pixels per inch | 180 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7 | 6.8 |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Qualcomm MSM8227 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 7.83 | 7.02 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | -- |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.86 | 1.32 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 720 x 480 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 4.51 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 4.6 | 2.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1230mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 700 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | 570 hours standby time 5.8 hours talk time |
| 3.04 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC Wildfire S has a global score of 47.7, which is a bit better than BLU Neo 3.5's overall score of 43.5. Both phones in this comparison include Android operating system, but HTC Wildfire S has an older 2.3.4 version and BLU Neo 3.5 has Android 4.2. Although it's the best we compare here, the HTC Wildfire S body is a little bit heavier and incredibly thicker than the BLU Neo 3.5.
The BLU Neo 3.5 features a little sharper screen than HTC Wildfire S, because although it has a bit lower amount of pixels per inch of display, and they both have exactly the same 480 x 320 resolution, the BLU Neo 3.5 also counts with a bit larger screen. BLU Neo 3.5 features a superior processor than HTC Wildfire S, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and a faster graphics processing unit working at 500 megahertz.
The HTC Wildfire S captures a lot better videos and photos than BLU Neo 3.5, and although they both have the same 720x480 video quality and the same video frame rate, the HTC Wildfire S also has a back facing camera with a much better 5 megapixels resolution. The BLU Neo 3.5 counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 64 GB.
BLU Neo 3.5 has just a bit better battery performance than HTC Wildfire S, because it has a 6% larger battery capacity.
The HTC Wildfire S is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.