Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.61 x 2.44 x 0.43 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.56 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 165 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 524,29 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.86 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 700 hours standby time 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.04 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has a score of 81.3, which is much better than the BLU Neo 3.5's 43.5 overall score. LG V35 ThinQ's body is heavier but incredibly thinner than the BLU Neo 3.5. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater processing power than BLU Neo 3.5, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ features a way better display than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has a much larger screen, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. LG V35 ThinQ has a lot better camera than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has a lot higher (4K) video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory for applications and games than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery performance than BLU Neo 3.5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than BLU Neo 3.5, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.