Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.35 x 2.48 x 0.41 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 900 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the BLU Neo 4.5, with a general score of 81.3 against 48.5. The LG V35 ThinQ body is much thinner but somewhat heavier than the BLU Neo 4.5. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a quite better hardware performance than BLU Neo 4.5, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a better looking screen than BLU Neo 4.5, because it has a lot greater screen density, a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a much bigger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better camera than BLU Neo 4.5, because it has a camera with a much higher resolution and a much better video resolution.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than BLU Neo 4.5, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a very superior battery lifetime than BLU Neo 4.5, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
The LG V35 ThinQ is a bit more expensive than BLU Neo 4.5, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.