Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.24 x 2.64 x 0.43 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 16 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is way better than BLU Quattro 4.5, having an 81.3 score against 50.4. The LG V35 ThinQ is a much thinner but a little bit heavier device than the BLU Quattro 4.5. LG V35 ThinQ features a better performing processing unit than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a greater number of cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a sharper display than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a lot better pixels density, a much bigger screen and a much better 1440 x 2880px resolution. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a very superior camera than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has a back facing camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot better video quality.
LG V35 ThinQ has much more memory for apps and games than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better battery duration than BLU Quattro 4.5, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than the BLU Quattro 4.5, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.