Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.35 x 3.26 x 0.42 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.57 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 258 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1500 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (24 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 900 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than BLU Quattro 5.7 HD's overall score of 51.3. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version while BLU Quattro 5.7 HD has Android 4.0 version, giving you some additional features. The LG V50 ThinQ is a extremely lighter and much thinner cellphone than BLU Quattro 5.7 HD.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid display than BLU Quattro 5.7 HD, because it has a little bit larger screen, a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games than BLU Quattro 5.7 HD, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a better CPU than BLU Quattro 5.7 HD, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much longer battery life than BLU Quattro 5.7 HD, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 2800mAh. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better camera than BLU Quattro 5.7 HD, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.