Search


Compare phones

Global Score
27.827.9
Basic Information
BLUCricket
--2009-09-22
4.13 x 2.28 x 0.55 inches3.54 x 1.81 x 0.74 inches
4.23 ounces2.82 ounces
Blue, Gray, Green, Pink, Purple and Yellow--
$ 40.00$ 40.00
Display / Screen
1.8 inches1.8 inches
--128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
64 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
4.55.4
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
32,77 MB internal memory--
microSD, microSDHC (up to 4 GB) external memory slotNo SD card slot
0.960
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
GPRS and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.20.1
Battery Life
800mAh Li-Ion Battery920mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
600 hours standby time
8 hours talk time
250 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.242.48
Other Features
--Bluetooth
Infra-red port--

Comparison review

Cricket CAPTR is slightly better than BLU SAMBA Q, getting a overall score of 27.9 against 27.8. The Cricket CAPTR construction is thicker but lighter than the BLU SAMBA Q. The Cricket CAPTR features a much better looking display than BLU SAMBA Q, and although they both have a same size screen, the Cricket CAPTR also has a lot higher pixel density.

BLU SAMBA Q counts with a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Cricket CAPTR, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 4 GB. The Cricket CAPTR's processing unit is just as good as BLU SAMBA Q's processing unit, both of them have 0 processing cores.

The Cricket CAPTR features a camera that is very similar to BLU SAMBA Q's camera, they have the same resolution back facing camera. The Cricket CAPTR has improved battery lifetime than BLU SAMBA Q, because it has a 15% greater battery size.

Cricket CAPTR and the BLU SAMBA Q cost the same.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.