Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.91 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than BLU Studio 5.0 C HD, with a score of 83.7 against 49.7. These devices use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version while BLU Studio 5.0 C HD has Android 4.4. LG V50 ThinQ features a more powerful processing unit than BLU Studio 5.0 C HD, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than BLU Studio 5.0 C HD, because it has a bigger screen, a lot higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and way more pixels per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ captures a lot better videos and photos than BLU Studio 5.0 C HD, because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back and a way higher video quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than BLU Studio 5.0 C HD, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than BLU Studio 5.0 C HD, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.