Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.71 x 2.87 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 129.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 800 hours standby time 18 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has an overall score of 81.6, which is way better than BLU Studio 5.0 CE's 47 general score. Google Pixel 2 is a somewhat lighter and thinner phone than the BLU Studio 5.0 CE. The Google Pixel 2 has a quite superior hardware performance than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and 6 more processing cores.
The Google Pixel 2 has a brighter screen than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Google Pixel 2 also has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a lot better number of pixels per inch of screen. Google Pixel 2 captures greater photographs and videos than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a very superior battery lifetime than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, because it has a 2700mAh battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 2 costs exactly the same than BLU Studio 5.0 CE, which makes it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.