Compare phones
Motorola Moto E
for America| Global Score | |
| 52.5 | 56.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Motorola |
| Android 4.3, 4.2.2 | Android 4.4.4, 4.4.3, 4.4.2 |
| -- | 2014-05-13 |
| 5.73 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 4.91 x 2.55 x 0.48 inches |
| 5.71 ounces | 5.01 ounces |
| Green, Pink and White | Black and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 540 x 960 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 220 pixels per inch | 256 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8926 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8210 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1400 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 3.82 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.60 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.38 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 4.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 1980mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 800 hours standby time 22 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto E has a general score of 56.9, which is just a bit better than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE's 52.5 overall score. These phones have Android OS, but Moto E has a more recent 4.4.4 version while BLU Studio 5.0 LTE has Android 4.3. The Moto E construction is somewhat lighter but way thicker than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE.
The BLU Studio 5.0 LTE counts with a bit superior processing unit than Motorola Moto E, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the BLU Studio 5.0 LTE also has a faster graphics co-processor and a larger number of faster cores. The Moto E counts with a bit more vivid display than BLU Studio 5.0 LTE, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 960 x 540 pixels, the Moto E also counts with a bit higher display pixel density.
The BLU Studio 5.0 LTE has a quite bigger storage for applications and games than Motorola Moto E, and although they both have the same 4 GB internal storage, the BLU Studio 5.0 LTE also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB. The BLU Studio 5.0 LTE has a much better camera than Motorola Moto E, because it has a much better resolution back-facing camera.
The Moto E and BLU Studio 5.0 LTE both count with very similar battery durations, although the Moto E has just 1980mAh of battery size against 2000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Moto E is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.