Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.1.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 220 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the BLU Studio 5.0S, with an 83.7 score against 48.7. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is a bit heavier but a bit thinner than BLU Studio 5.0S. Both devices in our current comparison include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and BLU Studio 5.0S has Android 4.1.2 version.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a greater hardware performance than BLU Studio 5.0S, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The LG V50 ThinQ features a sharper display than BLU Studio 5.0S, because it has a larger screen, a much higher screen pixels density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior memory for applications and games than BLU Studio 5.0S, because it has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots a lot better photos and videos than BLU Studio 5.0S, because it has a much higher video definition and a back camera with much more megapixels.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery life than BLU Studio 5.0S, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the BLU Studio 5.0S.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.