Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.05 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 208 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a lot better than BLU Studio 5.3S's score of 50.3. Samsung Galaxy S9 is a somewhat lighter and a little thinner phone than the BLU Studio 5.3S. Galaxy S9 has a greater hardware performance than BLU Studio 5.3S, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The Galaxy S9 features a brighter screen than BLU Studio 5.3S, because it has a way greater screen pixels density, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a quite bigger display. Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior camera than BLU Studio 5.3S, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega pixels and a lot higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than BLU Studio 5.3S, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 400 GB and 64 GB internal memory. Galaxy S9 counts with a little longer battery lifetime than BLU Studio 5.3S, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy S9 costs a bit more than BLU Studio 5.3S, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.