Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.2 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 4.0 |
| -- | 0000-00-00 |
| 6.19 x 3.12 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red, White and Yellow | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 100.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 178 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| -- | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.94 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4.4 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2250mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 4.16 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S III Cricket is a lot better than the BLU Studio 5.5, getting a overall score of 71.5 against 49.2. Galaxy S III Cricket's body is just a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter than BLU Studio 5.5. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S III Cricket has an older 4.0 version and BLU Studio 5.5 has Android 4.2.
Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has a bit better CPU than BLU Studio 5.5, because although it has 2 lesser cores , and they both have a 400 megahertz graphics co-processor, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also counts with more RAM memory. Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a more vivid screen than BLU Studio 5.5, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1280 x 720px resolution and a much better display pixel density.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a greater camera than BLU Studio 5.5, because it has a way higher 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels. Galaxy S III Cricket has a much better memory to store more games and applications than BLU Studio 5.5, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 64 GB, the Galaxy S III Cricket also has more internal memory.
BLU Studio 5.5 features just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S III Cricket, because it has a 2250mAh battery size instead of 2100mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket costs exactly the same than the BLU Studio 5.5, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.