Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.20 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 MSM8928 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 750 hours standby time 30 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, with an 83.7 score against 58.7. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and BLU Studio 6.0 LTE has Android 4.4.2 version. LG V50 ThinQ is a a bit thinner but just a little heavier phone than the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better processing unit than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 4 GB more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has a quite larger screen, a greater pixel amount per inch of screen and a way better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ takes much clearer photographs and videos than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because although it has a less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with longer battery lifetime than BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the BLU Studio 6.0 LTE, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.