Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.5 | 54.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | BLU |
| Android 4.4 | Android 5.0 Lollipop |
| -- | 2015-09-22 |
| 5.45 x 2.81 x 0.37 inches | 5.59 x 2.68 x 0.20 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 3.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 306 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.1 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 4.4 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2050mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 900 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
BLU Vivo Air LTE has an overall score of 54.3, which is a bit better than BLU Studio C mini's global score of 49.5. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but BLU Vivo Air LTE has the newer 5.0 Lollipop version and BLU Studio C mini has Android 4.4 version. The BLU Vivo Air LTE design is notably thinner and noticeably lighter than BLU Studio C mini.
BLU Studio C mini has a bit sharper screen than BLU Vivo Air LTE, although it has a lot worse 800 x 480 resolution, a way worse pixel count per inch in the display and a quite smaller screen. BLU Studio C mini counts with a bit more powerful processor than BLU Vivo Air LTE, because although it has 1,5 GB less RAM, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the BLU Studio C mini also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
The BLU Vivo Air LTE has a little bit better camera than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a way better video definition and a much more mega-pixels back camera. BLU Vivo Air LTE has a better storage capacity to install games and applications than BLU Studio C mini, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
BLU Vivo Air LTE counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than BLU Studio C mini, because it has 2050mAh of battery capacity against 2000mAh.
The BLU Vivo Air LTE not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.