Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | LG |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.45 x 2.81 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 900 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than the BLU Studio C mini, having an 81.3 score against 49.5. The LG V35 ThinQ is a a bit heavier but much thinner cellphone than BLU Studio C mini. LG V35 ThinQ features a better processing power than BLU Studio C mini, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and faster) and more RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a way better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution, way more pixels per display inch and a bigger screen. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better camera than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a way more megapixels back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than BLU Studio C mini, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG V35 ThinQ features a way better battery performance than BLU Studio C mini, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2000mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more money than BLU Studio C mini, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.