Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.5 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| BLU | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.45 x 2.81 x 0.37 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.50 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Orange, Pink, White and Yellow | Gold and Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 900 hours standby time 24 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active has an overall score of 81.9, which is a lot better than BLU Studio C mini's 49.5 general score. Although it's the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S8 Active's design is just a little thicker and noticeably heavier than the BLU Studio C mini. Galaxy S8 Active has a much more vibrant display than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a much greater pixels number per inch in the screen, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a larger screen.
The Galaxy S8 Active features a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 256 GB and 60 GB more internal storage. Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little faster processor than BLU Studio C mini, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a very superior battery life than BLU Studio C mini, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S8 Active has a very superior camera than BLU Studio C mini, because it has a lot better video definition and a camera in the back with a much better 12 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.